The problem this addresses

Artificial intelligence governance is one of the most consequential policy areas of this decade. The decisions being made now — about which AI systems get regulated, how government agencies can use AI to make decisions about citizens, what transparency requirements apply, and how Canada participates in international AI safety frameworks — will shape Canadian life for a generation.

Yet AI policy is almost entirely invisible to most Canadians. Bills move through parliamentary committee with little public attention. Voluntary codes are signed without press scrutiny. Hundreds of millions of dollars are committed to AI infrastructure alongside almost nothing on safety research. The public conversation rarely rises above either utopian enthusiasm or vague alarm, without the specific, substantive engagement that democratic accountability requires.

This gap is partly a communications problem — AI governance doesn't have the visceral immediacy of a healthcare crisis or a cost-of-living squeeze — and partly a knowledge problem. The technical complexity of AI is real. The institutional complexity of Canadian federalism is real. Most people interested in engaging simply don't know where to start.

Civic AI Canada exists to close that gap.


What this site does

Three things, specifically:

It tracks. Federal and provincial AI-related legislation, with plain-language summaries and current status. Public positions from the Prime Minister, federal ministers, and provincial Premiers. Canadian news coverage of AI policy, filtered for relevance. When something happens — a bill moves through committee, a minister makes a statement, a regulation is proposed — this site records it.

It explains. The AI 101 page covers what modern AI actually is, how it differs from earlier software, what the realistic risks are (organized by category), and why those risks are taken seriously by serious people. The glossary defines every technical term used on the site. The goal is a reader who is smart and educated but new to AI — the kind of reader who should be engaged with this policy area but currently isn't, because the entry cost is too high.

It activates. The Citizen Toolkit provides concrete, specific guidance for engaging elected representatives: how to find your MP, how to write an effective letter, how to participate in a parliamentary committee consultation, how to use your professional expertise if you have it. No vague "make your voice heard" filler — only actionable steps.


Who it's for

Educated adults who are not already specialists in AI or policy. People who read long-form journalism, who vote and follow politics, who may have a professional stake in AI's development — in healthcare, law, education, finance, the public service — but who don't have time to monitor parliamentary committee transcripts.

It is not for AI researchers (who have better resources) or for people who want a policy advocacy organization (Civic AI Canada takes no positions on specific legislation). It is for citizens who want to understand what's happening and have meaningful, informed opinions about it.


How it's funded

Civic AI Canada is a volunteer initiative led by Aziza F. Mohammed. It is not affiliated with any government, political party, AI company, or advocacy organization. Funding model and organizational structure are being developed; this section will be updated when that information is available.


Expert commentary and media

We offer expert commentary, background briefings, and opinion writing on a wide range of social, economic, and environmental issues arising from artificial intelligence — including AI governance, labour market impacts, digital rights, algorithmic accountability, and Canada's role in international AI safety frameworks.

We welcome requests for interviews, background conversations, speaking engagements, panel participation, and written contributions. Please reach out at civicaicanada@gmail.com with details about your request and timeline.


Errors, corrections, and contributions

The trackers are maintained by hand. If you find an error in a bill summary, a misquoted position, a broken link, or missing legislation, please write to civicaicanada@gmail.com with the details. Corrections will be made promptly.


Editorial guidelines

Civic AI Canada is an independent publication on AI governance and policy. Every piece we publish meets the standards below, and every contributor agrees to them before publication.

These guidelines protect our readers, our contributors, and the authority of the publication. They apply equally to every writer, from first-time contributors to senior advisors.

Human authorship and editing

Every piece published by Civic AI Canada is drafted entirely by a human author and edited entirely by a human editor. We develop a collaborative relationship with each of our writers. A “perfect” submission is not expected and not possible. We will work with you to get your submission where it needs to be for publication.

Contributors may not use generative AI tools to draft, rewrite, or translate any part of a submission. As a publication that examines AI in public life, we hold ourselves to this standard as a conscious choice. As a result, we publish less than other outlets. However, you know that each of our pieces meets the highest editorial standard and follows the gold standard of protocol for publishers.

Languages

We welcome articles in any of the six official languages of the United Nations: Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish. The same editorial standards apply for every language.

Originality and first publication

Civic AI Canada publishes original work only. Submissions must not have appeared elsewhere in any form, including on Substack, Medium, LinkedIn, or personal websites.

After publication, contributors may republish their piece elsewhere only after 3 days and only with both of the following:

  • An opening line reading “Originally published by Civic AI Canada”
  • A direct link to the original article on civicaicanada.org

The Civic AI Canada version remains the version of record.

Submissions that are not accepted for publication may not be presented as written for, commissioned by, or associated with Civic AI Canada. This has become a common issue on LinkedIn with several students and recent graduates claiming that they have written pieces for Civic AI Canada which were in fact declined.

Editorial process

Every submission is reviewed and edited by the Civic AI Canada editorial team before publication.

  • The editor makes final decisions on acceptance, structure, headlines and publication timing.
  • Authors review and approve any changes that affect facts or meaning.
  • Accepted pieces are published under the author's name with a short contributor biography.

Civic AI Canada publishes student work rarely, and only from graduate students.

Policy pieces require authors with a graduate degree or equivalent senior professional experience. Authors without either are published only on technical topics.

Sourcing and references

Factual claims, data and quotations must be sourced. All references must be formatted as numbered endnotes, with a link or full citation for every source. Identify primary documents such as legislation, policy papers and official statements wherever possible.

Affiliations and conflicts of interest

Contributors who hold institutional roles write in a personal capacity. Their pieces carry a disclaimer stating that the analysis is their own and does not represent the position of their employer or institution.

Contributors must disclose any paid, advisory or other relationship relevant to the subject of their piece. Disclosed relationships are noted with the article.

Promotion and amplification

Contributors share responsibility for bringing their work to readers. When your piece is published:

  • Repost the official Civic AI Canada announcement of your article.
  • Include the hashtag #CivicAICanada in every repost or post about your piece.
  • Link to the article on civicaicanada.org.

How to submit

Send a pitch letter and/or complete draft to civicaicanada@gmail.com, with a short biography and any affiliations to disclose. By submitting, you agree to these guidelines.

Merci à vous.

Contact

Editorial principles

  • Plain language: no jargon without definition
  • Accuracy over speed: corrections are made promptly when errors are found
  • Placeholders are clearly marked as such
  • No advocacy: this site tracks and explains; it does not campaign
  • Sources are cited for every factual claim
  • Read our full editorial guidelines

Contributors

Analysis and commentary on this site is written by the people below. Where a contributor holds an institutional or government role, a disclaimer notes that their writing reflects independent analysis, not an official position.

Aziza F. Mohammed

Aziza F. Mohammed

Executive Director

Aziza F. Mohammed is a global governance expert and international development consultant. She worked on the UNCCD COP16 negotiations for UNDP. Her work at the World Bank includes the flagship Scaling Solar program, serving on the team that built a new National Development Strategy (NDS II) for Qatar, and work across the Middle East and North Africa as part of the World Bank MENA Vice-President’s Office. She has also held senior roles at Women and Gender Equality Canada and Natural Resources Canada. Off-screen, she enjoys watching films and eating chocolate.

Prithy Ahmed

Prithy Ahmed

Senior Policy Analyst

Standards Council of Canada

Prithy Ahmed is a Senior Policy Analyst working on AI policy and governance initiatives for the federal government of Canada. She advises on integrating technical standards into responsible AI governance practices and has conducted research on the impacts of AI technologies on trade. She holds a master’s degree in public policy and global affairs from the University of British Columbia.

Disclaimer: Contributions reflect Prithy Ahmed’s independent analysis and do not represent an official position of the Standards Council of Canada.

Mike Clarke

Mike Clarke

Dramatherapist & Researcher; CEO, Same Page Solutions Inc.

Same Page Solutions Inc., Toronto

Mike Clarke is a dramatherapist, researcher, and CEO of Same Page Solutions Inc., based in Toronto, Canada. He brings over a decade of expertise supporting children and young people, autistic adults, and adults navigating periods of crisis.

Sarry Zheng

Sarry Zheng

Digital Transformation Advisor

Sarry Zheng advises businesses and governments on digital transformation, AI adoption, and innovation across North America. With an MBA and a background in science, she helps organizations de-risk technological change and navigate the complex digital landscape responsibly. Raised in an entrepreneurial family, she has a lifelong passion for helping small businesses succeed.

John Henderson

John Henderson

Software Engineer

John Henderson is a software engineer based in Vancouver, BC, focused on making the transition to transformative AI go well for Canadians and beyond. He brings a builder’s perspective to AI governance, helping make a fast-moving field legible to the public. Off-screen, he’s usually birding, playing jazz piano, or out for a run.

Recent articles

Kelley Prendergast

Kelley Prendergast

Adjunct Professor

Kelley Prendergast is a recent PhD graduate in Health and Society at McMaster University. Her research focused on parental perceptions of visual features of neighbourhoods and greenspaces that are conducive for healthy early childhood development. She has taught at McMaster University, University of Winnipeg, and Conestoga College and worked in research at the Ontario government and other research institutes. Kelley was also an intern for Salon West in 2015.